[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <159612421491.1041762.16502562347274669841.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:52:08 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/alternatives: move length validation inside the subsection
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:37:01 -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> Commit f7b93d42945c ("arm64/alternatives: use subsections for replacement
> sequences") breaks LLVM's integrated assembler, because due to its
> one-pass design, it cannot compute instruction sequence lengths before the
> layout for the subsection has been finalized. This change fixes the build
> by moving the .org directives inside the subsection, so they are processed
> after the subsection layout is known.
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64/alternatives: move length validation inside the subsection
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/966a0acce2fc
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists