[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf7af4c9-592a-2143-831a-cb0f44bc768e@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:31:45 -0700
From: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>
CC: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the hmm tree with the drm tree
On 7/30/20 5:03 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 07:21:10PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the hmm tree got a conflict in:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>> 7763d24f3ba0 ("drm/nouveau/vmm/gp100-: fix mapping 2MB sysmem pages")
>>
>> from the drm tree and commits:
>>
>> 4725c6b82a48 ("nouveau: fix mapping 2MB sysmem pages")
>> 1a77decd0cae ("nouveau: fix storing invalid ptes")
>>
>> from the hmm tree.
>>
>> 7763d24f3ba0 and 4725c6b82a48 are exactly the same patch.
>
> Oh? Ralph? What happened here?
Ben did email me saying he was planning to take this patch into
his nouveau tree and I did reply to him saying you had also taken it
into your tree and that I had more nouveau/SVM patches for you on the way.
So, I'm not sure what happened.
> Ben can you drop 7763d24f3ba0 ?
>
> Jason
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists