[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcyRjAr3ugmAWYcKMrAeea6ioQOPfJnj-Srntdg_W8ScQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:50:29 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Julia Suvorova <jusual@...hat.com>
Cc: "open list:VFIO DRIVER" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Use MMCONFIG for all PCI config space accesses
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:37 PM Julia Suvorova <jusual@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Using MMCONFIG instead of I/O ports cuts the number of config space
> accesses in half, which is faster on KVM and opens the door for
> additional optimizations such as Vitaly's "[PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: KVM
> MEM_PCI_HOLE memory":
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200728143741.2718593-1-vkuznets@redhat.com
You may use Link: tag for this.
> However, this change will not bring significant performance improvement
> unless it is running on x86 within a hypervisor. Moreover, allowing
> MMCONFIG access for addresses < 256 can be dangerous for some devices:
> see commit a0ca99096094 ("PCI x86: always use conf1 to access config
> space below 256 bytes"). That is why a special feature flag is needed.
>
> Introduce KVM_FEATURE_PCI_GO_MMCONFIG, which can be enabled when the
> configuration is known to be safe (e.g. in QEMU).
...
> +static int __init kvm_pci_arch_init(void)
> +{
> + if (raw_pci_ext_ops &&
> + kvm_para_has_feature(KVM_FEATURE_PCI_GO_MMCONFIG)) {
Better to use traditional pattern, i.e.
if (not_supported)
return bail_out;
...do useful things...
return 0;
> + pr_info("PCI: Using MMCONFIG for base access\n");
> + raw_pci_ops = raw_pci_ext_ops;
> + return 0;
> + }
> + return 1;
Hmm... I don't remember what positive codes means there. Perhaps you
need to return a rather error code?
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists