[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200730205112.2099429-4-ndesaulniers@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 13:51:11 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck15@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Lvqiang Huang <lvqiang.huang@...soc.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] ARM: backtrace-clang: give labels more descriptive names
Removes the 1004 label; it was neither a control flow target, nor an
instruction we expect to produce a fault.
Gives the labels slightly more readable names. The `b` suffixes are
handy to disambiguate between labels of the same identifier when there's
more than one. Since these labels are unique, let's just give them
names.
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
---
arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S | 22 ++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
index 40eb2215eaf4..7dad2a6843a5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
+++ b/arch/arm/lib/backtrace-clang.S
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ for_each_frame: tst frame, mask @ Check for address exceptions
* start. This value gets updated to be the function start later if it is
* possible.
*/
-1001: ldr sv_pc, [frame, #4] @ get saved 'pc'
-1002: ldr sv_fp, [frame, #0] @ get saved fp
+load_pc: ldr sv_pc, [frame, #4] @ get saved 'pc'
+load_fp: ldr sv_fp, [frame, #0] @ get saved fp
teq sv_fp, mask @ make sure next frame exists
beq no_frame
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ for_each_frame: tst frame, mask @ Check for address exceptions
* registers for the current function, but the stacktrace is still printed
* properly.
*/
-1003: ldr sv_lr, [sv_fp, #4] @ get saved lr from next frame
+load_lr: ldr sv_lr, [sv_fp, #4] @ get saved lr from next frame
tst sv_lr, #0 @ If there's no previous lr,
beq finished_setup @ we're done.
@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ finished_setup:
/*
* Print the function (sv_pc) and where it was called from (sv_lr).
*/
-1004: mov r0, sv_pc
-
+ mov r0, sv_pc
mov r1, sv_lr
mov r2, frame
bic r1, r1, mask @ mask PC/LR for the mode
@@ -182,7 +181,7 @@ finished_setup:
* pointer the comparison will fail and no registers will print. Unwinding will
* continue as if there had been no registers stored in this frame.
*/
-1005: ldr r1, [sv_pc, #0] @ if stmfd sp!, {..., fp, lr}
+load_stmfd: ldr r1, [sv_pc, #0] @ if stmfd sp!, {..., fp, lr}
ldr r3, .Lopcode @ instruction exists,
teq r3, r1, lsr #11
ldr r0, [frame] @ locals are stored in
@@ -201,7 +200,7 @@ finished_setup:
mov frame, sv_fp @ above the current frame
bhi for_each_frame
-1006: adr r0, .Lbad
+bad_frame: adr r0, .Lbad
mov r1, loglvl
mov r2, frame
bl printk
@@ -216,11 +215,10 @@ bad_lr: mov sv_fp, #0
ENDPROC(c_backtrace)
.pushsection __ex_table,"a"
.align 3
- .long 1001b, 1006b
- .long 1002b, 1006b
- .long 1003b, 1006b
- .long 1004b, 1006b
- .long 1005b, 1006b
+ .long load_pc, bad_frame
+ .long load_fp, bad_frame
+ .long load_lr, bad_frame
+ .long load_stmfd, bad_frame
.long prev_call, bad_lr
.popsection
--
2.28.0.163.g6104cc2f0b6-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists