[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730211019.lsqar5vbrxu5xw2u@skbuf>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 00:10:19 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Jonathan McDowell <noodles@...th.li>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Matthew Hagan <mnhagan88@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: qca8k: Add 802.1q VLAN support
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:40:29AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> > > +
> > > + for (vid = vlan->vid_begin; vid <= vlan->vid_end && !ret; ++vid)
> > > + ret = qca8k_vlan_add(priv, port, vid, !untagged);
> > > +
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to add VLAN to port %d (%d)", port, ret);
> > > +
> >
> > If for some reason there is a temporary failure in qca8k_vlan_add, you'd
> > be swallowing it instead of printing the error and stopping the
> > execution.
>
> I don't follow; I'm breaking out of the for loop when we get an error? I
> figured that was a better move than potentially printing 4095 error
> messages if they were all going to fail.
>
Oh, you are. What an exotic way to write this loop, my brain stopped
parsing beyond "vid_end".
Thanks,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists