[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF6AEGv-e5KdbcDcst=y+h-uhDa4sKKEMoGuA88bvZ_1i46RLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:26:08 -0700
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@...eaurora.org>,
freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@...edesktop.org,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@...eaurora.org>,
Sharat Masetty <smasetty@...eaurora.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
saravanak@...gle.com, Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
Jonathan <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Add support for GPU DDR BW scaling
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:37 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 30-07-20, 08:27, Rob Clark wrote:
> > Hmm, I've already sent my pull request to Dave, dropping the patch
> > would require force-push and sending a new PR. Which I can do if Dave
> > prefers. OTOH I guess it isn't the end of the world if the patch is
> > merged via two different trees.
>
> I don't think a patch can go via two trees, as that would have two sha
> keys for the same code.
>
> Though it is fine for a patch to go via two different trees if we make
> sure the same sha key is used for both.
>
> Will it be possible for you to provide a branch/tag of your branch
> that I can base stuff of ?
>
Ok, I sent a v2 pull req that dropped the OPP patch. Both are tagged
so Dave can use either version, so I guess you two can coordinate this
BR,
-R
Powered by blists - more mailing lists