[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730230634.GA17221@dev-dsk-anchalag-2a-9c2d1d96.us-west-2.amazon.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 23:06:34 +0000
From: Anchal Agarwal <anchalag@...zon.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <bp@...en8.de>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <kamatam@...zon.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
<len.brown@...el.com>, <pavel@....cz>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<eduval@...zon.com>, <sblbir@...zon.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] xen/manage: keep track of the on-going suspend mode
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 06:08:29PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On 7/24/20 7:01 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Yes, it does, thank you. I'd rather not introduce unknown regressions so
> > I would recommend to add an arch-specific check on registering
> > freeze/thaw/restore handlers. Maybe something like the following:
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > .freeze = blkfront_freeze,
> > .thaw = blkfront_restore,
> > .restore = blkfront_restore
> > #endif
> >
> >
> > maybe Boris has a better suggestion on how to do it
>
>
> An alternative might be to still install pm notifier in
> drivers/xen/manage.c (I think as result of latest discussions we decided
> we won't need it) and return -ENOTSUPP for ARM for
> PM_HIBERNATION_PREPARE and friends. Would that work?
>
I think the question here is for registering driver specific freeze/thaw/restore
callbacks for x86 only. I have dropped the pm_notifier in the v3 still pending
testing. So I think just registering driver specific callbacks for x86 only is a
good option. What do you think?
Anchal
>
> -boris
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists