[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730150322.5c55ec66@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:03:22 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security tree
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:59:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 12:35:03 +1000 (AEST) James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2020, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > > I am still applying the above patch ...
> > >
> > > The merge window is coming up fast ... is anything happening about this
> > > failure?
> >
> > A new patch is coming, but I'm not sure this code has had enough review
> > from the core VFS folk.
> >
> > Please drop secure_uffd_v5.9 for the time being.
>
> You just need to remove/revert it from your security tree
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git#next-testing).
In today's linux-next I have reverted the three commits in that branch:
d08ac70b1e0d Wire UFFD up to SELinux
2b72259a271a Teach SELinux about anonymous inodes
2749d3f84a70 Add a new LSM-supporting anonymous inode interface
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists