[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa122230-e0fd-6ed6-5473-31b17b56260c@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 15:24:14 +0900
From: Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@...il.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp
Cc: Mori.Takahiro@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp,
Motai.Hirotaka@...MitsubishiElectric.co.jp,
'Sungjong Seo' <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: retain 'VolumeFlags' properly
Ping..
On 2020/07/15 19:06, Tetsuhiro Kohada wrote:
>> It looks complicated. It would be better to simply set/clear VOLUME DIRTY bit.
>
> I think exfat_set_vol_flags() gets a little complicated,
> because it needs the followings (with bit operation)
> a) Set/Clear VOLUME_DIRTY.
> b) Set MEDIA_FAILUR.
How about splitting these into separate functions as below?
exfat_set_volume_dirty()
exfat_set_vol_flags(sb, sbi->vol_flag | VOLUME_DIRTY);
exfat_clear_volume_dirty()
exfat_set_vol_flags(sb, sbi->vol_flag & ~VOLUME_DIRTY);
exfat_set_media_failure()
exfat_set_vol_flags(sb, sbi->vol_flag | MEDIA_FAILURE);
The implementation is essentially the same for exfat_set_vol_flags(),
but I think the intention of the operation will be easier to understand.
BR
---
Tetsuhiro Kohada <kohada.t2@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists