[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730075040.GA21623@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:50:40 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] locking/qspinlock: Break qspinlock_types.h header
loop
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:47:16AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> We may ask Synopsys folks to look at this as well.
> Vineet, any ideas if we may unify ATOMIC64_INIT() across the architectures?
I don't think there is any technical difficulty. The custom
atomic64_t simply adds an alignment requirement so the initialisor
remains the same.
I just didn't want to add more complexity to the existing patch.
As a follow-up patch it should be quite straightforward.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists