[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200730082318.42584-2-haokexin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:23:18 +0800
From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] tracing/hwlat: Honor the tracing_cpumask
In calculation of the cpu mask for the hwlat kernel thread, the wrong
cpu mask is used instead of the tracing_cpumask, this causes the
tracing/tracing_cpumask useless for hwlat tracer. Fixes it.
Fixes: 0330f7aa8ee6 ("tracing: Have hwlat trace migrate across tracing_cpumask CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index ddb528a6cd51..17873e5d0353 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static bool disable_migrate;
static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
{
struct cpumask *current_mask = &save_cpumask;
+ struct trace_array *tr = hwlat_trace;
int next_cpu;
if (disable_migrate)
@@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
goto disable;
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
next_cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), current_mask);
put_online_cpus();
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static int start_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
/* Just pick the first CPU on first iteration */
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
put_online_cpus();
next_cpu = cpumask_first(current_mask);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists