[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730100126.410b3fb1@oasis.local.home>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:01:26 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, chunyan.zhang@...soc.com,
Zhaoyang Huang <zhaoyang.huang@...soc.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace : use kvmalloc instead of kmalloc
This is also the second version of the patch. Please add a v2 to the
subject, otherwise it gets confusing to know which one to pull in.
"[PATCH v2] ..."
-- Steve
On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 19:04:12 +0800
Zhaoyang Huang <huangzhaoyang@...il.com> wrote:
> High order memory stuff within trace could introduce OOM, use kvmalloc instead.
>
> Please find the bellowing for the call stack we run across in an android system. The scenario happens when traced_probes is woken up to get a large quantity of trace even if free memory is even higher than watermark_low.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists