linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: move shared library build rules to scripts/gcc-plugins/Makefile

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNASRoqNfO+JAj9kKRgi3ee5mcdV99spy4t6jKG1RGC4KXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:16:17 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kbuild: move shared library build rules to scripts/gcc-plugins/Makefile

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 6:18 AM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:15:36PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > The shared library build rules are currently implemented in
> > scripts/Makefile.host, but actually GCC-plugin is the only user of
> > them. Hence, they do not need to be treewide available.
>
> Are none of the VDSOs intending to use these rules?


Right.

GCC plugin .so files are compiled for the _host_ architecture.
vDSO .so files are compiled for the _target_ architecture.

They are built in completely different ways.



> > Move all the relevant build rules to scripts/gcc-plugins/Makefile.
> >
> > I also optimized the build steps so *.so is directly built from .c
> > because every upstream plugin is compiled from a single source file.
> >
> > I am still keeping the infrastructure to build a plugin from multiple
> > files because Kees suggested to do so in my previous attempt.
> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/11/1107)
> >
> > If the plugin, foo.so, is compiled from two files foo.c and foo2.c,
> > then you can do like follows:
> >
> >   foo-objs := foo.o foo2.o
> >
> > Single-file plugins do not need the *-objs notation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
>
> But, yeah, sure!
>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> Unrelated, but I do note that objtool maybe has the wrong indentation,
> path name reporting, and tool names (HOSTLD vs CC)?


Right.
Many people know it.


objtool opts out the Kbuild instructure.

I wrote a patch to make objtool join the Kbuild:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10839051/

The objtool maintainers refused to do this.






> ...
>   HOSTCC  scripts/asn1_compiler
>   HOSTCC  scripts/extract-cert
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/genksyms.o
>   YACC    scripts/genksyms/parse.tab.[ch]
>   LEX     scripts/genksyms/lex.lex.c
>   DESCEND  objtool
>   HOSTCXX scripts/gcc-plugins/cyc_complexity_plugin.so
>   HOSTCXX scripts/gcc-plugins/latent_entropy_plugin.so
>   HOSTCXX scripts/gcc-plugins/structleak_plugin.so
>   GENSEED scripts/gcc-plugins/randomize_layout_seed.h
>   HOSTCXX scripts/gcc-plugins/stackleak_plugin.so
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/parse.tab.o
>   HOSTCC  scripts/genksyms/lex.lex.o
>   HOSTCC   /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/fixdep.o
>   HOSTLD  arch/x86/tools/relocs
>   HOSTLD   /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/fixdep-in.o
>   LINK     /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/fixdep
>   CC       /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/exec-cmd.o
>   CC       /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/help.o
>   CC       /home/kees/src/linux-build/plugins/tools/objtool/weak.o
> ...
>
> --
> Kees Cook



--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada