linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/8] modules: inherit TAINT_PROPRIETARY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:01:58 +0200
From:   Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] modules: inherit TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE

+++ Christoph Hellwig [31/07/20 11:00 +0200]:
>On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:51:30AM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>>> +	if (mod->using_gplonly_symbols) {
>>> +		pr_info("%s: module using GPL-only symbols uses symbols from proprietary module %s.\n",
>>> +			mod->name, owner->name);
>>
>> pr_err() maybe?
>>
>>> +		return false;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (!test_bit(TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, &mod->taints)) {
>>> +		pr_info("%s: module uses symbols from proprietary module %s, inheriting taint.\n",
>>> +			mod->name, owner->name);
>>
>> and pr_warn()? But otherwise this looks much better.
>
>Ok with me.  Can you just fix it up, or do you want a full resend?

I can fix it up, no need to resend. Thanks!