[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200731095808.GB18776@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:28:08 +0530
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...abs.org>,
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] powerpc/smp: Implement cpu_to_coregroup_id
* Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> [2020-07-31 18:02:21]:
> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > Lookup the coregroup id from the associativity array.
>
Thanks Michael for all your comments and inputs.
> It's slightly strange that this is called in patch 9, but only properly
> implemented here in patch 10.
>
> I'm not saying you have to squash them together, but it would be good if
> the change log for patch 9 mentioned that a subsequent commit will
> complete the implementation and how that affects the behaviour.
>
I probably got influenced by few LKML community members who always add a
stub and implement the gory details in a subsequent patch. I will surely add
the change log in patch 9 about the subsequent patches.
> cheers
>
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
Powered by blists - more mailing lists