linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dma-pool: Do not allocate pool memory from CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f3aa4dfe0741a487c9d3d2f3c948195505ca041.camel@suse.de>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:09:37 +0200
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jeremy.linton@....com,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-pool: Do not allocate pool memory from CMA

Hi Nathan,

On Thu, 2020-07-30 at 18:10 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:09:18PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Ok, I found a slight bug that wasn't intended.  I wanted to make sure
> > we can always fall back to a lower pool, but got that wrong.  Should be
> > fixed in the next version.
> 
> Hi Christoph and Nicolas,
> 
> Did a version of that series ever get send out? I am coming into the
> conversation late but I am running into an issue with the Raspberry Pi 4
> not booting on linux-next, which appears to be due to this patch now in
> mainline as commit d9765e41d8e9 ("dma-pool: do not allocate pool memory
> from CMA") combined with
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200725014529.1143208-2-jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com/
> in -next:
> 
> [    1.423163] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00000001 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.431883] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030046 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.443888] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.452527] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 0 config (-22 80)
> [    1.460836] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.469445] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 1 config (-22 81)
> [    1.477735] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.486350] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 2 config (-22 82)
> [    1.494639] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.503246] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 3 config (-22 83)
> [    1.511529] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.520131] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 4 config (-22 84)
> [    1.528414] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.537017] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 5 config (-22 85)
> [    1.545299] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.553903] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 6 config (-22 86)
> [    1.562184] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043
> [    1.570787] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 7 config (-22 87)
> [    1.579897] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030030 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.589419] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00028001 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.599391] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.608018] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 1 config (-22 81)
> [    1.616313] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.624932] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 1 config (-22 81)
> [    1.633195] pwrseq_simple: probe of wifi-pwrseq failed with error -22
> [    1.643904] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.652544] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 2 config (-22 82)
> [    1.660839] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030041 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.669446] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 2 state (-22 82)
> [    1.677727] leds-gpio: probe of leds failed with error -22
> [    1.683735] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.692346] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 6 config (-22 86)
> [    1.700636] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.709240] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 6 config (-22 86)
> [    1.717496] reg-fixed-voltage: probe of sd_vcc_reg failed with error -22
> [    1.725546] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.734176] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 4 config (-22 84)
> [    1.742465] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00030043 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.751072] raspberrypi-exp-gpio soc:firmware:gpio: Failed to get GPIO 4 config (-22 84)
> [    1.759332] gpio-regulator: probe of sd_io_1v8_reg failed with error -22
> [    1.768042] raspberrypi-firmware soc:firmware: Request 0x00028001 returned status 0x00000000
> [    1.780871] ALSA device list:
> [    1.783960]   No soundcards found.
> [    1.787633] Waiting for root device PARTUUID=45a8dd8a-02...
> 
> I am unsure if it is related to the issue that Amit is having or
> if that makes sense at all but I can reliably reproduce it.
> 
> v5.8-rc1: OK
> v5.8-rc1 + d9765e41d8e9e: OK
> v5.8-rc1 + "of_address: Add bus type match for pci ranges parser": OK
> v5.8-rc1 + both: BROKEN
> 
> I wanted to test the series to see if this fixes anything. If you would
> prefer a different thread for this or further information, please let
> me know.

This is a DT issue, dev->bus_dma_limit is not being properly initialized.
Without d9765e41d8e9e all atomic dma allocations fall into CMA, which is DMA
friendly in RPi4, but it isn't the case anymore with the patch. We now rely on
dev->bus_dma_limit being correct to get memory from the right place.

I already sent a fix to the DT folks.

Regards,
Nicolas