[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKu4CB7-b_hRvu63c9jQ_S91epWMr=P__9Fu-h_WFR-_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:03:07 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: address: Fix parser address/size cells initialization
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 4:02 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
>
> bus->count_cells() parses cells starting from the node's parent. This is
> not good enough for parser_init() which is generally parsing a bus node.
>
> Revert to previous behavior using of_bus_n_*_cells().
>
> Fixes: 2f96593ecc37 ("of_address: Add bus type match for pci ranges parser")
> Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/of/address.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
We have a unit test for this code, does it fail? If not, adjusting it
to fail or adding a test case would be nice. Either way:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists