linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] lib/vsprintf: Force type of flags for gfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200731120426.6fa1b20d@oasis.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 12:04:26 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] lib/vsprintf: Force type of flags for gfp_t

On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:49:46 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> > > +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
> > > @@ -1937,7 +1937,7 @@ char *flags_string(char *buf, char *end, void *flags_ptr,
> > >               names = vmaflag_names;
> > >               break;
> > >       case 'g':
> > > -             flags = *(gfp_t *)flags_ptr;
> > > +             flags = (__force typeof(flags))(*(gfp_t *)flags_ptr);  
> >
> > Do we really need to say "typeof(flags)" ? What about simply using
> > flags' type?  
> 
> Whatever you prefer. I actually came with the latter and switched to the former.
> So, I'll switch back for v2.

For this instance, I prefer spelling out the type.

Thanks!

-- Steve