[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200730225106.241f0f36@oasis.local.home>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:51:06 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: <mingo@...hat.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
<dietmar.eggemann@....com>, <bsegall@...gle.com>,
<mgorman@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove duplicated tick_nohz_full_enabled() check
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 19:17:55 +0800
linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com> wrote:
> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>
> The func tick_nohz_full_enabled() is also called by tick_nohz_full_cpu().
> So this one is duplicated and should be removed.
Seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 877fb08eb1b0..02028f785f87 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1930,12 +1930,7 @@ extern int __init sched_tick_offload_init(void);
> */
> static inline void sched_update_tick_dependency(struct rq *rq)
> {
> - int cpu;
> -
> - if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
> - return;
> -
> - cpu = cpu_of(rq);
> + int cpu = cpu_of(rq);
>
> if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> return;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists