linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwlock: qcom: Remove invalid binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKKQmLNwQDVJDOQdVZ9iYb4DXDCnfzsBE9q32jaRcefCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:53:35 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwlock: qcom: Remove invalid binding

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 6:48 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The Qualcomm hwlock is described in DeviceTree either directly on the
> mmio bus or split between a syscon and a mutex node, but as noted in
> [1] the latter is not valid DT, so remove any traces of this from the
> binding.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAL_JsqLa9GBtbgN6aL7AQ=A6V-YRtPgYqh6XgM2kpx532+r4Gg@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  .../bindings/hwlock/qcom-hwspinlock.yaml      | 25 +------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 24 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>