linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Add wallclock time conversion support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <27a4663d-bc71-5f52-5871-23d4061fe575@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:46:21 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     peterz@...radead.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        Geneviève Bastien <gbastien@...satic.net>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
        Jeremie Galarneau <jgalar@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] perf tools: Add wallclock time conversion support

On 7/31/20 12:05 PM, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:36:12AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>> yep, we have a customer that needs to compare data from multiple servers
>>
>> It's also needed to correlate over different guests on the same machine.
>> This is an important use case.
> 
> Both these cases you want to sync up CLOCK_MONOTONIC, using walltime is
> just utterly misguided.

Every userspace component logs in walltime. You can say that is
misguided, but that is the way it is. The missing piece is the ability
to correlate kernel events to userspace logs.

> 
> What happens if the servers have (per accident or otherwise) different
> DST settings, or someone does a clock_setttime() for giggles.

Yes, someone *could* change the time. Someone *could* start ntpd or
other time server in the middle of a session. While technically such
things can happen, that is not real life in most environments (e.g.,
Data center servers). ntpd (or other) is started at boot, and it is just
the little misc adjustments that happen over time.

We could add tracepoints and detect the changes and invalidate the
reference time. We could add tracepoints to track the adjustments and
update the reference time. In my experience over 9+ years using this
tool (out of tree patches) that has never been the problem.

> 
> All you really want is a clock that runs at the same rate but is not
> subject to random jumps and user foibles.
> 

All I want is to compare user logs to a kernel event via timestamps.