linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] KASAN-KUnit Integration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABVgOSnFanyCtBFaFAdrArr+hkXCdNu5vCNmciLP0ftQRgAsXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 1 Aug 2020 15:17:36 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc:     Patricia Alfonso <trishalfonso@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/5] KASAN-KUnit Integration

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 9:25 PM 'Andrey Konovalov' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 6:43 AM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patchset contains everything needed to integrate KASAN and KUnit.
> >
> > KUnit will be able to:
> > (1) Fail tests when an unexpected KASAN error occurs
> > (2) Pass tests when an expected KASAN error occurs
> >
> > Convert KASAN tests to KUnit with the exception of copy_user_test
> > because KUnit is unable to test those.
> >
> > Add documentation on how to run the KASAN tests with KUnit and what to
> > expect when running these tests.
> >
> > This patchset depends on:
> > - "kunit: extend kunit resources API" [1]
> >  - This is already present in the kselftest/kunit branch
> >
> > I'd _really_ like to get this into 5.9 if possible: we also have some
> > other changes which depend on some things here.
>
> Hi David,
>
> You'll need to rebase this on top of the mm tree, which currently
> contains Walter's patch titled "kasan: fix KASAN unit tests for
> tag-based KASAN".
>
> There's also another patch that touches KASAN tests in the series I've
> just mailed titled "kasan: support stack instrumentation for tag-based
> mode".
>
> Thanks!
>

I've rebased this on top of a linux-next (with the pending KUnit
patches from kselftest/kunit and the "kasan: support stack
instrumentation for tag-based mode" patchset applied):
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200801070924.1786166-1-davidgow@google.com/T/#u

Note that the RCU test doesn't seem to be compatible with KUnit's
KASAN integration at present: I'm no expert on RCU, but it looks like
the current test context might not be propagated to the callback, so
expecting the failure doesn't work. Given that KUnit also doesn't look
for the aux stacks (just that a failure occurred), it seemed best to
avoid trying to port that one to KUnit, so I've left it in the
test_kasan_module.c file. It may be possible to port it at a later
date.

Note that I don't have an arm64 setup here, so I haven't actually
tested the tag-based KASAN stuff yet.

Cheers,
-- David