[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200801114050.GB377079@li-24c3614c-2adc-11b2-a85c-85f334518bdb.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 06:40:50 -0500
From: "Paul A. Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 00/19] perf metric: Add support to reuse metric
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 11:18:49AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> this patchset is adding the support to reused metric in
> another metric.
>
> For example, to define IPC by using CPI with change like:
>
> {
> "BriefDescription": "Instructions Per Cycle (per Logical Processor)",
> - "MetricExpr": "INST_RETIRED.ANY / CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD",
> + "MetricExpr": "1/CPI",
> "MetricGroup": "TopDownL1",
> "MetricName": "IPC"
> },
>
> I won't be able to find all the possible places we could
> use this at, so I wonder you guys (who was asking for this)
> would try it and come up with comments if there's something
> missing or we could already use it at some places.
>
> It's based on Arnaldo's tmp.perf/core.
>
> v4 changes:
> - removed acks from patch because it changed a bit
> with the last fixes:
> perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node
> - fixed runtime metrics [Kajol Jain]
> - increased recursion depth [Paul A. Clarke]
> - changed patches due to dependencies:
> perf metric: Collect referenced metrics in struct metric_ref_node
> perf metric: Add recursion check when processing nested metrics
> perf metric: Rename struct egroup to metric
> perf metric: Rename group_list to metric_list
>
> Also available in here:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git
> perf/metric
I built and ran from the above git branch, and things seem to work.
Indeed, I was able to apply my changes to exploit the new capabilities
via modifications to tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/powerpc/power9/metrics.json,
as I posted earlier (and will submit once this set gets merged).
Tested-by: Paul A. Clarke <pc@...ibm.com>
One thing I noted, but which also occurs without these patches, is that
the perf metrics are not computed unless run as root:
--
$ perf stat --metrics br_misprediction_percent command
Performance counter stats for 'command':
1,823,530,051 pm_br_pred:u
2,662,705 pm_br_mpred_cmpl:u
$ /usr/bin/sudo perf stat --metrics br_misprediction_percent command
Performance counter stats for 'command':
1,824,655,269 pm_br_pred # 0.09 br_misprediction_percent
1,654,466 pm_br_mpred_cmpl
--
Is that expected? I don't think it's always been that way.
PC
Powered by blists - more mailing lists