linux-kernel - [PATCH] checkpatch: Remove missing switch/case break test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e25090c79f6a69d502ab8219863300790192fe2.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 01 Aug 2020 09:05:22 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Cambda Zhu <cambda@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Remove missing switch/case break test

This test doesn't work well and newer compilers are much better
at emitting this warning.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
> 在 2020年8月1日，02:05，Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> 写道：
> > On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 20:59 +0800, Cambda Zhu wrote:
> > > The checkpatch.pl only searches 3 previous lines when finding missing
> > > switch/case break, and macros are treated as normal statements. If the
> > > cases are surrounded with CONFIG, checkpatch.pl may report false
> > > warnings. For example:
> > 
> > Likely this test should be removed altogether as
> > it's never really worked well and now compilers
> > find this and emit warnings.

 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 25 -------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index cc5542cc234f..4aa1d9d5e62c 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6541,31 +6541,6 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
-# check for case / default statements not preceded by break/fallthrough/switch
-		if ($line =~ /^.\s*(?:case\s+(?:$Ident|$Constant)\s*|default):/) {
-			my $has_break = 0;
-			my $has_statement = 0;
-			my $count = 0;
-			my $prevline = $linenr;
-			while ($prevline > 1 && ($file || $count < 3) && !$has_break) {
-				$prevline--;
-				my $rline = $rawlines[$prevline - 1];
-				my $fline = $lines[$prevline - 1];
-				last if ($fline =~ /^\@\@/);
-				next if ($fline =~ /^\-/);
-				next if ($fline =~ /^.(?:\s*(?:case\s+(?:$Ident|$Constant)[\s$;]*|default):[\s$;]*)*$/);
-				$has_break = 1 if ($rline =~ /fall[\s_-]*(through|thru)/i);
-				next if ($fline =~ /^.[\s$;]*$/);
-				$has_statement = 1;
-				$count++;
-				$has_break = 1 if ($fline =~ /\bswitch\b|\b(?:break\s*;[\s$;]*$|exit\s*\(\b|return\b|goto\b|continue\b)/);
-			}
-			if (!$has_break && $has_statement) {
-				WARN("MISSING_BREAK",
-				     "Possible switch case/default not preceded by break or fallthrough comment\n" . $herecurr);
-			}
-		}
-
 # check for /* fallthrough */ like comment, prefer fallthrough;
 		my @fallthroughs = (
 			'fallthrough',