[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200801032450.3028986-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 11:24:50 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, <chao@...nel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [f2fs-dev][PATCH] f2fs: update_sit_entry: Make the judgment condition of f2fs_bug_on more intuitive
Current judgment condition of f2fs_bug_on in function update_sit_entry():
new_vblocks >> (sizeof(unsigned short) << 3) ||
new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg
which equivalents to:
new_vblocks < 0 || new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg
The latter is more intuitive.
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Reported-by: Jack Qiu <jack.qiu@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index 196f31503511..41836447418d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
new_vblocks = se->valid_blocks + del;
offset = GET_BLKOFF_FROM_SEG0(sbi, blkaddr);
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, (new_vblocks >> (sizeof(unsigned short) << 3) ||
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, (new_vblocks < 0 ||
(new_vblocks > sbi->blocks_per_seg)));
se->valid_blocks = new_vblocks;
--
2.25.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists