[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200802202737.4ftnva6x345ddkki@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 22:27:37 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Yu-Hsuan Hsu <yuhsuan@...omium.org>,
Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] pwm: cros-ec: Accept more error codes from
cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status
Hello Guenter,
On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:32:19AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > If I understand correctly this surprising calling convention (output
> > parameter is filled even though the function returned an error) is the
> > old one that is to be fixed.
>
> Sorry, I don't get your point. This is the old convention, correct,
> which we still want to support at this point. Plus, it matches the
> current code, as surprosing as it may be.
OK, so I understood correctly and everything is fine.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists