linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] counter: Add character device interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200802211142.GB606173@shinobu>
Date:   Sun, 2 Aug 2020 17:11:42 -0400
From:   William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     jic23@...nel.org, kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com, gwendal@...omium.org,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, syednwaris@...il.com,
        patrick.havelange@...ensium.com, fabrice.gasnier@...com,
        mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] counter: Add character device interface

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 05:49:37PM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 7/28/20 7:20 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> > On 7/21/20 2:35 PM, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> >> This patch introduces a character device interface for the Counter
> >> subsystem. Device data is exposed through standard character device read
> >> operations. Device data is gathered when a Counter event is pushed by
> >> the respective Counter device driver. Configuration is handled via ioctl
> >> operations on the respective Counter character device node.
> > 
> > This sounds similar to triggers and buffers in the iio subsystem. And
> > I can see how it might be useful in some cases. But I think it would not
> > give the desired results when performance is important.
> > 
> 
> By the way, I really appreciate the work you have done here. When reviewing
> code, it is easy to point out what is wrong or we don't like and to not
> mention all the parts that are good. And there is a lot of really good work
> here already.
> 
> I've been working on this all week to try out some of my suggestions and
> I'm not getting very far. This is a very difficult problem to solve!
> 
> I just wanted to mention this since I responded to this patch series
> already but I am still learning and trying things. So I may have more/
> different feedback in the future and I may decide some of my suggestions
> are not so good. :-)
> 
> And one more thing, there was a nice talk at the Embedded Linux
> Conference last month about lessons learned from designing a userspace
> API for the GPIO subsystem [1]. Unfortunately, there is no video yet,
> but the slides might have some helpful ideas about mistakes to avoid.
> 
> [1]: https://elinux.org/ELC_2020_Presentations

Thanks! I appreciate the words of encouragement. :-)

This is a big endeavor so I'm expecting a lot of mistakes and changes
along the way. Since we're designing a new userspace interface as well,
I want to make sure it's correct before we commit it, because when it's
finally introduced we're basically stuck with it. So I'm happy when
mistakes are found because it saves me from having to live with those
later after the interface is live.

I'll respond to your PATCH 3/5 review later this week or coming weekend
when I get the chance.

Thanks again,

William Breathitt Gray

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)