[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3A3F5CA5-85C9-4CD8-9CF1-8A4411901C1F@public-files.de>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2020 10:17:31 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
CC: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/mediatek: dpi/dsi: change the getting possible_crtc way
Am 2. August 2020 05:07:41 MESZ schrieb Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>:
>I would like more information of why do this patch. For example:
>
>For current mediatek dsi encoder, its possible crtc is fixed in crtc
>0, and mediatek dpi encoder's possible crtc is fixed in crtc 1. In
>some SoC the possible crtc is not fixed in this case, so call
>mtk_drm_find_possible_crtc_by_comp() to find out the correct possible
>crtc.
sounds good (and you have much more knowledge about drm subsystem than i). I will take this for next version
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists