linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 07/23] ACPI: HMAT: Attach a device for each soft-reserved range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 02 Aug 2020 22:03:03 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
        vishal.l.verma@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        vishal.l.verma@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, joao.m.martins@...cle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/23] ACPI: HMAT: Attach a device for each soft-reserved
 range

The hmem enabling in commit 'cf8741ac57ed ("ACPI: NUMA: HMAT: Register
"soft reserved" memory as an "hmem" device")' only registered ranges to
the hmem driver for each soft-reservation that also appeared in the
HMAT. While this is meant to encourage platform firmware to "do the
right thing" and publish an HMAT, the corollary is that platforms that
fail to publish an accurate HMAT will strand memory from Linux usage.
Additionally, the "efi_fake_mem" kernel command line option enabling
will strand memory by default without an HMAT.

Arrange for "soft reserved" memory that goes unclaimed by HMAT entries
to be published as raw resource ranges for the hmem driver to consume.

Include a module parameter to disable either this fallback behavior, or
the hmat enabling from creating hmem devices. The module parameter
requires the hmem device enabling to have unique name in the module
namespace: "device_hmem".

The driver depends on the architecture providing phys_to_target_node()
which is only x86 via numa_meminfo() and arm64 via a generic memblock
implementation.

Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---
 drivers/dax/hmem/Makefile |    3 ++-
 drivers/dax/hmem/device.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/Makefile b/drivers/dax/hmem/Makefile
index a9d353d0c9ed..57377b4c3d47 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/hmem/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/Makefile
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM) += dax_hmem.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM_DEVICES) += device.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DEV_DAX_HMEM_DEVICES) += device_hmem.o
 
+device_hmem-y := device.o
 dax_hmem-y := hmem.o
diff --git a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
index b9dd6b27745c..cb6401c9e9a4 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/hmem/device.c
@@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
 #include <linux/dax.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 
+static bool nohmem;
+module_param_named(disable, nohmem, bool, 0444);
+
 void hmem_register_device(int target_nid, struct resource *r)
 {
 	/* define a clean / non-busy resource for the platform device */
@@ -17,6 +20,9 @@ void hmem_register_device(int target_nid, struct resource *r)
 	struct memregion_info info;
 	int rc, id;
 
+	if (nohmem)
+		return;
+
 	rc = region_intersects(res.start, resource_size(&res), IORESOURCE_MEM,
 			IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED);
 	if (rc != REGION_INTERSECTS)
@@ -63,3 +69,32 @@ void hmem_register_device(int target_nid, struct resource *r)
 out_pdev:
 	memregion_free(id);
 }
+
+static __init int hmem_register_one(struct resource *res, void *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If the resource is not a top-level resource it was already
+	 * assigned to a device by the HMAT parsing.
+	 */
+	if (res->parent != &iomem_resource) {
+		pr_info("HMEM: skip %pr, already claimed\n", res);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	hmem_register_device(phys_to_target_node(res->start), res);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static __init int hmem_init(void)
+{
+	walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_SOFT_RESERVED,
+			IORESOURCE_MEM, 0, -1, NULL, hmem_register_one);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * As this is a fallback for address ranges unclaimed by the ACPI HMAT
+ * parsing it must be at an initcall level greater than hmat_init().
+ */
+late_initcall(hmem_init);