lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dc832ef3-37a5-fbcb-cb87-607232fe67b4@chromium.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 19:46:42 +0200
From:   KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 0/7] Generalizing bpf_local_storage



On 8/3/20 6:46 PM, KP Singh wrote:
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...gle.com>
> 
> # v7 -> v8
> 
> - Fixed an issue with BTF IDs for helpers and added
>   bpf_<>_storage_delete to selftests to catch this issue.
> - Update comments about refcounts and grabbed a refcount to the open
>   file for userspace inode helpers.
> - Rebase.
> 

Apologies, I missed that bpf-next is already closed. 

I will resend this as a v9 after it opens again.

[...]

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ