[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+oQyQhAaB-jP8MxKp9jTEbr4c0oxPY5FiwmQRcnqJOdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:27:39 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Use bigger address cells to catch parser regressions
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:25 AM Nicolas Saenz Julienne
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de> wrote:
>
> Getting address and size cells for dma-ranges/ranges parsing is tricky
> and shouldn't rely on the node's count_cells() method. The function
> starts looking for cells on the parent node, as its supposed to work
> with device nodes, which doesn't work when input with bus nodes, as
> generally done when parsing ranges.
>
> Add test to catch regressions on that specific quirk as developers will
> be tempted to edit it out in favor of the default method.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> ---
> drivers/of/unittest-data/tests-address.dtsi | 10 +++++-----
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists