lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:31:19 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring changes for 5.9-rc1

On 8/3/20 3:10 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 01:53:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:48 PM Linus Torvalds
>> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've pushed out my merge of this thing [..]
>>
>> It seems I'm not the only one unhappy with the pull request.
>>
>> For some reason I also don't see pr-tracker-bot being all happy and
>> excited about it. I wonder why.
> 
> My guess it's because the body consists of two text/plain MIME-parts and 
> Python returned the merge.txt part first, where we didn't find what we 
> were looking for.
> 
> I'll see if I can teach it to walk all text/plain parts looking for 
> magic git pull strings instead of giving up after the first one.

Thanks, I was a bit puzzled on that one too, and this time it definitely
wasn't because the tag wasn't there.

In terms of attachments, I'm usually a fan of inlining, but seemed cleaner
to me to attach the merge resolution as there's already a ton of other
stuff in that email.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ