[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80f5e213-502b-3532-e782-6f26a778274e@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:12:03 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com,
chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com,
chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, cc.chou@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt
notification
On 2020-07-31 16:17, Can Guo wrote:
> For scsi_dma_unmap() part, that is true - we should make it serialized with
> any other completion paths. I've found it during my fault injection test, so
> I've made a patch to fix it, but it only comes in my next error recovery
> enhancement patch series. Please check the attachment.
Hi Can,
It is not clear to me how that patch serializes scsi_dma_unmap() against
other completion paths? Doesn't the regular completion path call
__ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() without holding the host lock?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists