lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 20:12:03 -0700 From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org> To: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>, Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, beanhuo@...ron.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kuohong.wang@...iatek.com, peter.wang@...iatek.com, chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com, andy.teng@...iatek.com, chaotian.jing@...iatek.com, cc.chou@...iatek.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification On 2020-07-31 16:17, Can Guo wrote: > For scsi_dma_unmap() part, that is true - we should make it serialized with > any other completion paths. I've found it during my fault injection test, so > I've made a patch to fix it, but it only comes in my next error recovery > enhancement patch series. Please check the attachment. Hi Can, It is not clear to me how that patch serializes scsi_dma_unmap() against other completion paths? Doesn't the regular completion path call __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() without holding the host lock? Thanks, Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists