linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 10/56] sctp: implement memory accounting on tx path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200803121850.821743926@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  3 Aug 2020 14:19:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 10/56] sctp: implement memory accounting on tx path

From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>

[ Upstream commit 1033990ac5b2ab6cee93734cb6d301aa3a35bcaa ]

Now when sending packets, sk_mem_charge() and sk_mem_uncharge() have been
used to set sk_forward_alloc. We just need to call sk_wmem_schedule() to
check if the allocated should be raised, and call sk_mem_reclaim() to
check if the allocated should be reduced when it's under memory pressure.

If sk_wmem_schedule() returns false, which means no memory is allowed to
allocate, it will block and wait for memory to become available.

Note different from tcp, sctp wait_for_buf happens before allocating any
skb, so memory accounting check is done with the whole msg_len before it
too.

Reported-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/sctp/socket.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index c93be3ba5df29..df4a7d7c5ec04 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -1931,7 +1931,10 @@ static int sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(struct sctp_association *asoc,
 	if (sctp_wspace(asoc) < (int)msg_len)
 		sctp_prsctp_prune(asoc, sinfo, msg_len - sctp_wspace(asoc));
 
-	if (sctp_wspace(asoc) <= 0) {
+	if (sk_under_memory_pressure(sk))
+		sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
+
+	if (sctp_wspace(asoc) <= 0 || !sk_wmem_schedule(sk, msg_len)) {
 		timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
 		err = sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(asoc, &timeo, msg_len);
 		if (err)
@@ -8515,7 +8518,10 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(struct sctp_association *asoc, long *timeo_p,
 			goto do_error;
 		if (signal_pending(current))
 			goto do_interrupted;
-		if ((int)msg_len <= sctp_wspace(asoc))
+		if (sk_under_memory_pressure(sk))
+			sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
+		if ((int)msg_len <= sctp_wspace(asoc) &&
+		    sk_wmem_schedule(sk, msg_len))
 			break;
 
 		/* Let another process have a go.  Since we are going
-- 
2.25.1