linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arch_topology: disable frequency invariance for CONFIG_BL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Aug 2020 15:39:44 +0100
From:   Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arch_topology: disable frequency invariance for
 CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER

Hi guys,

On Friday 31 Jul 2020 at 16:48:38 (+0100), Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:29:52PM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >
> > Are there still any users of CONFIG_BL_SWITCHER? I guess it's only
> > limited to A15/A7 systems w/ vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c ... so probably only
> > TC2?
> 
> I think so as no one shouted when I merged bL switcher driver into
> vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> 

I think a good indication is also the fact that frequency invariance was
broken for a long time for bL_switcher_enabled systems and nobody
shouted.

A way to make this nicer is to fully remove BL_SWITCHER support. This
support was valuable at its time, but given that now there is proper
asymmetric CPU capacity support, is there any reason to hold on to this?

Thanks,
Ionela.

> -- 
> Regards,
> Sudeep