[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200803150756.GA1098726@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:07:56 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dongdong Yang <contribute.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: rjw@...ysocki.net, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, gulinghua@...omi.com,
tanggeliang@...omi.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangdongdong@...omi.com,
duhui@...omi.com, zhangguoquan@...omi.com, fengwei@...omi.com,
taojun@...omi.com, rocking@...ux.alibaba.com, huangqiwu@...omi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched: Provide USF for the portable equipment.
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 10:31:15PM +0800, Dongdong Yang wrote:
> + /*
> + * create a sched_usf in cpu_subsys:
> + * /sys/devices/system/cpu/sched_usf/...
I thought I asked you not to use a "raw" kobject, you are making this
much harder than it has to be.
Just use a normal struct device.
Also you failed to document your new sysfs files in Documentation/ABI/
like is required :(
Because of both of those things, this isn't ok as-is, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists