[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200804205812.055623798@goodmis.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:57:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [for-linus][PATCH 01/17] tracing: Simplify defining of the next event id
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
The value to be used and compared in trace_search_list() is "last + 1".
Let's just define next to be "last + 1" instead of doing the addition
each time.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200703020612.12930-2-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
index 73976de7f8cc..a35232d61601 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_output.c
@@ -675,11 +675,11 @@ static LIST_HEAD(ftrace_event_list);
static int trace_search_list(struct list_head **list)
{
struct trace_event *e;
- int last = __TRACE_LAST_TYPE;
+ int next = __TRACE_LAST_TYPE + 1;
if (list_empty(&ftrace_event_list)) {
*list = &ftrace_event_list;
- return last + 1;
+ return next;
}
/*
@@ -687,17 +687,17 @@ static int trace_search_list(struct list_head **list)
* lets see if somebody freed one.
*/
list_for_each_entry(e, &ftrace_event_list, list) {
- if (e->type != last + 1)
+ if (e->type != next)
break;
- last++;
+ next++;
}
/* Did we used up all 65 thousand events??? */
- if ((last + 1) > TRACE_EVENT_TYPE_MAX)
+ if (next > TRACE_EVENT_TYPE_MAX)
return 0;
*list = &e->list;
- return last + 1;
+ return next;
}
void trace_event_read_lock(void)
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists