[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200804054313.GA100819@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 22:43:13 -0700
From: Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, adobriyan@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, christian.brauner@...ntu.com,
areber@...hat.com, serge@...lyn.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] proc: Introduce /proc/namespaces/ directory to
expose namespaces lineary
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 06:01:20PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> On 30.07.2020 17:34, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com> writes:
> >
> >> Currently, there is no a way to list or iterate all or subset of namespaces
> >> in the system. Some namespaces are exposed in /proc/[pid]/ns/ directories,
> >> but some also may be as open files, which are not attached to a process.
> >> When a namespace open fd is sent over unix socket and then closed, it is
> >> impossible to know whether the namespace exists or not.
> >>
> >> Also, even if namespace is exposed as attached to a process or as open file,
> >> iteration over /proc/*/ns/* or /proc/*/fd/* namespaces is not fast, because
> >> this multiplies at tasks and fds number.
Could you describe with more details when you need to iterate
namespaces?
There are three ways to hold namespaces.
* processes
* bind-mounts
* file descriptors
When CRIU dumps a container, it enumirates all processes, collects file
descriptors and mounts. This means that we will be able to collect all
namespaces, doesn't it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists