linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] thermal for v5.9-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:32:12 +0800
From:   Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
        Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@...labora.com>,
        Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
        Lukasz Luba <Lukasz.Luba@....com>,
        Sumeet Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@...el.com>,
        Henry Yen <henry.yen@...iatek.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marian-Cristian Rotariu 
        <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] thermal for v5.9-rc1

Hi, Linus,

On Mon, 2020-08-03 at 20:26 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 2:44 PM Daniel Lezcano <
> daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> > 
> > 
ssh://git@...olite.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thermal/linux.git
> > tags/thermal-v5.9-rc1
> 
> This was all rebased just an hour before you sent it to me.
> 
> Why?
> 

There must be something wrong here, Daniel and I are following a strict
process to make sure that we don't lose any history.

For this PR, I'm not quite sure what happened, he probably did
something by mistake when generating it.

thanks,
rui

> Maybe it's how you commonly work, and I just haven't noticed before,
> but it's wrong for all the reasons I've stated about a million times
> now.
> 
> What makes it so hard for people to understand? What makes that "you
> sent me a completely untested pull request and that's not ok" so
> difficult a concept to get?
> 
> And dammit, if you do it and have a good reason to do this despite
> literally *decades* of me telling people not to do that, and why it's
> wrong, then  you can spend the five minutes *explaining* why you do
> something that is widely documented to be bad.
> 
> These commits sure as hell weren't in linux-next either.
> 
>                    Linus