[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eb3cf1b2-8519-1722-22aa-6182ee734a27@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:02:27 +1000
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH kernel] serial_core: Check for port state when tty is
in error state
Ping?
ps. Greg, your name came up in "git format-patch -M --stdout -1 HEAD |
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl --norolestats --l" ;)
On 28/07/2020 22:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> At the moment opening a serial device node (such as /dev/ttyS3)
> succeeds even if there is no actual serial device behind it.
> Reading/writing/ioctls (most) expectantly fail as the uart port is not
> initialized (the type is PORT_UNKNOWN) and the TTY_IO_ERROR error state
> bit is set fot the tty.
>
> However syzkaller (a syscall fuzzer) found that setting line discipline
> does not have these checks all the way down to io_serial_out() in
> 8250_port.c (8250 is the default choice made by univ8250_console_init()).
> As the result of PORT_UNKNOWN, uart_port::iobase is NULL which
> a platform translates onto some address accessing which produces a crash
> like below.
>
> This adds tty_io_error() to uart_set_ldisc() to prevent the crash.
>
> The example of crash on PPC64/pseries:
>
> BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xc00a000000000001
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000c9c9cc
> cpu 0x0: Vector: 300 (Data Access) at [c00000000c6d7800]
> pc: c000000000c9c9cc: io_serial_out+0xcc/0xf0
> lr: c000000000c9c9b4: io_serial_out+0xb4/0xf0
> sp: c00000000c6d7a90
> msr: 8000000000009033
> dar: c00a000000000001
> dsisr: 42000000
> current = 0xc00000000cd22500
> paca = 0xc0000000035c0000 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01
> pid = 1371, comm = syz-executor.0
> Linux version 5.8.0-rc7-le-guest_syzkaller_a+fstn1 (aik@...n1-p1) (gcc (Ubunt
> untu) 2.30) #660 SMP Tue Jul 28 22:29:22 AEST 2020
> enter ? for help
> [c00000000c6d7a90] c0000000018a8cc0 _raw_spin_lock_irq+0xb0/0xe0 (unreliable)
> [c00000000c6d7ad0] c000000000c9bdc0 serial8250_do_set_ldisc+0x140/0x180
> [c00000000c6d7b10] c000000000c9bea4 serial8250_set_ldisc+0xa4/0xb0
> [c00000000c6d7b50] c000000000c91138 uart_set_ldisc+0xb8/0x160
> [c00000000c6d7b90] c000000000c5a22c tty_set_ldisc+0x23c/0x330
> [c00000000c6d7c20] c000000000c4c220 tty_ioctl+0x990/0x12f0
> [c00000000c6d7d20] c00000000056357c ksys_ioctl+0x14c/0x180
> [c00000000c6d7d70] c0000000005635f0 sys_ioctl+0x40/0x60
> [c00000000c6d7db0] c00000000003b814 system_call_exception+0x1a4/0x330
> [c00000000c6d7e20] c00000000000d368 system_call_common+0xe8/0x214
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
> ---
>
> While looking at it, I noticed that a bunch of callbacks are prone to
> this bug and since I wanted to fix them all with minimum effort,
> I tried checking for PORT_UNKNOWN in uart_port_check() but it breaks
> device opening. Another approach could be checking for uart_port::iobase
> in 8250 (and probably uart_port::membase as well) but this will make
> the rest of the code to think the device is ok while there is no device
> at all.
>
> What would the correct approach be and what is the expectation?
>
> The fact that /dev/ttyS3 opened in the first place is confusing already.
>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index c15e208d9bec..cdece1c8e123 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -1467,6 +1467,9 @@ static void uart_set_ldisc(struct tty_struct *tty)
> struct uart_state *state = tty->driver_data;
> struct uart_port *uport;
>
> + if (tty_io_error(tty))
> + return;
> +
> mutex_lock(&state->port.mutex);
> uport = uart_port_check(state);
> if (uport && uport->ops && uport->ops->set_ldisc)
>
--
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists