[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c9d8003-ba3f-8f2d-7c5a-56c5ca7db750@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 20:15:43 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot <syzbot+9116ecc1978ca3a12f43@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: defer kfree() of vc_screenbuf in vc_do_resize()
Do you think this approach is acceptable? Or, do we need to modify set_origin() ?
On 2020/07/29 23:57, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> syzbot is reporting UAF bug in set_origin() from vc_do_resize() [1], for
> vc_do_resize() calls kfree(vc->vc_screenbuf) before calling set_origin().
>
> Unfortunately, in set_origin(), vc->vc_sw->con_set_origin() might access
> vc->vc_pos when scroll is involved in order to manipulate cursor, but
> vc->vc_pos refers already released vc->vc_screenbuf until vc->vc_pos gets
> updated based on the result of vc->vc_sw->con_set_origin().
>
> Preserving old buffer and tolerating outdated vc members until set_origin()
> completes would be easier than preventing vc->vc_sw->con_set_origin() from
> accessing outdated vc members.
>
> [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=6649da2081e2ebdc65c0642c214b27fe91099db3
>
> Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+9116ecc1978ca3a12f43@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> ---
> drivers/tty/vt/vt.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> index 42d8c67..c9ee8e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> @@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@ static int vc_do_resize(struct tty_struct *tty, struct vc_data *vc,
> unsigned int old_rows, old_row_size, first_copied_row;
> unsigned int new_cols, new_rows, new_row_size, new_screen_size;
> unsigned int user;
> - unsigned short *newscreen;
> + unsigned short *oldscreen, *newscreen;
> struct uni_screen *new_uniscr = NULL;
>
> WARN_CONSOLE_UNLOCKED();
> @@ -1294,10 +1294,11 @@ static int vc_do_resize(struct tty_struct *tty, struct vc_data *vc,
> if (new_scr_end > new_origin)
> scr_memsetw((void *)new_origin, vc->vc_video_erase_char,
> new_scr_end - new_origin);
> - kfree(vc->vc_screenbuf);
> + oldscreen = vc->vc_screenbuf;
> vc->vc_screenbuf = newscreen;
> vc->vc_screenbuf_size = new_screen_size;
> set_origin(vc);
> + kfree(oldscreen);
>
> /* do part of a reset_terminal() */
> vc->vc_top = 0;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists