linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove a waiter for checkpoint completion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:16 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To:     Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
        <kernel-team@...roid.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: remove a waiter for checkpoint
 completion

On 2020/8/4 9:04, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 08/04, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/8/4 1:28, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> It doesn't need to wait for checkpoint being completed triggered by end_io.
>>>
>>> [   20.157753] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>>> [   20.158393] do not call blocking ops when !TASK_RUNNING; state=2 set at [<0000000096354225>] prepare_to_wait+0xcd/0x430
>>> [   20.159858] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1152 at kernel/sched/core.c:7142 __might_sleep+0x149/0x1a0
>>> ...
>>> [   20.176110]  __submit_merged_write_cond+0x191/0x310
>>> [   20.176739]  f2fs_submit_merged_write+0x18/0x20
>>> [   20.177323]  f2fs_wait_on_all_pages+0x269/0x2d0
>>> [   20.177899]  ? block_operations+0x980/0x980
>>> [   20.178441]  ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
>>> [   20.178975]  ? finish_wait+0x260/0x260
>>> [   20.179488]  ? percpu_counter_set+0x147/0x230
>>> [   20.180049]  do_checkpoint+0x1757/0x2a50
>>> [   20.180558]  f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x840/0xaf0
>>> [   20.181126]  f2fs_sync_fs+0x287/0x4a0
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 6 +-----
>>>    fs/f2fs/data.c       | 4 ----
>>>    fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       | 1 -
>>>    fs/f2fs/super.c      | 1 -
>>>    4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> index 99c8061da55b9..2bdddc725e677 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> @@ -1255,11 +1255,7 @@ static void unblock_operations(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>>    void f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>>    {
>>> -	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>>> -
>>>    	for (;;) {
>>> -		prepare_to_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>>
>> Wouldn't that case high cpu usage before io end?
> 
> This is a critical path to wait for IO completion in checkpoint, which would be
> better to wait for it to avoid long latency to continue filesystem operations.

Yup, in previous implementation, last end_io wakes up checkpoint() waiter, we
didn't waste any time there.

> Moreover, I expect io_schedule_timeout() can mitigate such the CPU overhead and
> actually we don't need to make there-in context switches as well.

Then io_schedule_timeout() in this loop may give CPU time slice to other thread
until scheduler reselect checkpoint(), that would cause longer latency?

> 
>>
>>> -
>>>    		if (!get_pages(sbi, type))
>>>    			break;
>>> @@ -1271,9 +1267,9 @@ void f2fs_wait_on_all_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int type)
>>>    							FS_CP_META_IO);
>>>    		else if (type == F2FS_WB_CP_DATA)
>>>    			f2fs_submit_merged_write(sbi, DATA);
>>> +
>>>    		io_schedule_timeout(DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
>>>    	}
>>> -	finish_wait(&sbi->cp_wait, &wait);
>>>    }
>>>    static void update_ckpt_flags(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> index c1b676be67b9a..588d2871bbe69 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> @@ -383,10 +383,6 @@ static void f2fs_write_end_io(struct bio *bio)
>>>    		clear_cold_data(page);
>>>    		end_page_writeback(page);
>>>    	}
>>> -	if (!get_pages(sbi, F2FS_WB_CP_DATA) &&
>>> -				wq_has_sleeper(&sbi->cp_wait))
>>> -		wake_up(&sbi->cp_wait);
>>> -
>>>    	bio_put(bio);
>>>    }
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 02811ce15059b..a036539363030 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -1437,7 +1437,6 @@ struct f2fs_sb_info {
>>>    	struct rw_semaphore cp_rwsem;		/* blocking FS operations */
>>>    	struct rw_semaphore node_write;		/* locking node writes */
>>>    	struct rw_semaphore node_change;	/* locking node change */
>>> -	wait_queue_head_t cp_wait;
>>>    	unsigned long last_time[MAX_TIME];	/* to store time in jiffies */
>>>    	long interval_time[MAX_TIME];		/* to store thresholds */
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index 83bf9a02f83f2..5f4d9abc079d6 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -3540,7 +3540,6 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>>>    	init_rwsem(&sbi->cp_rwsem);
>>>    	init_rwsem(&sbi->quota_sem);
>>> -	init_waitqueue_head(&sbi->cp_wait);
>>>    	init_sb_info(sbi);
>>>    	err = init_percpu_info(sbi);
>>>
> .
>