[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jhjbljqikmi.mognet@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:52:21 +0100
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...nel.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] sched/doc: Document capacity aware scheduling
On 04/08/20 12:26, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>> Add some documentation detailing the concepts, requirements and
>> implementation of capacity aware scheduling across the different scheduler
>> classes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/scheduler/index.rst | 1 +
>> Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst | 439 +++++++++++++++++++++
>
> How about I make this a .txt file and remove all that unreadable rst
> nonsense?
I wouldn't mind *too* much, all diagrams are ASCII-based and the rest would
just be plain text.
I get that the whole backtick thing is a bit annoying, but it's only there for
symbols that aren't functions (since "foo()" gets automagically detected as
a C reference), and because they aren't functions I would've gone for some
other form of emphasis anyway (quotes or asterisks or something).
That said, Ingo picked it up early and it's already gone in via the
sched/core PR.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists