[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200804000614.4176212-1-joshdon@google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:06:14 -0700
From: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: ignore cache hotness for SMT migration
SMT siblings share caches, so cache hotness should be irrelevant for
cross-sibling migration.
Proposed-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2ba8f230feb9..5b203b55bcb2 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7402,6 +7402,9 @@ static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
if (unlikely(task_has_idle_policy(p)))
return 0;
+ if ((env->sd->flags & cpu_smt_flags()) == cpu_smt_flags())
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
*/
--
2.28.0.163.g6104cc2f0b6-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists