lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:44:14 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Gutson <daniel@...ypsium.com>
Cc:     Derek Kiernan <derek.kiernan@...inx.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Hughes <hughsient@...il.com>,
        Alex Bazhaniuk <alex@...ypsium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Platform lockdown information in SYSFS

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 11:37:02AM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 11:23 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <
> gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 10:50:13AM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 3:41 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > > <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:04:56PM -0300, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> > > > > > > > Think of this as an input device.  You don't put the random
> input
> > > > > > > > attributes all in one place, you create a new device that
> represents the
> > > > > > > > input interface and register that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm having trouble with this. What's the dev_t for the child
> devices?
> > > > > I'm doing
> > > > >     child_device = device_create(&my_class, &pdev->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
> > > > > NULL, "child");
> > > > > pdev is the pci_device (intel-spi-pci)
> > > > > dmesg shows
> > > > >
> > > > >     sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/class/my-class'
> > > > >     (call trace)
> > > > >     kobject_add_internal failed for my-class with -EEXIST, don't try
> > > > > to register things with the same name in the same directory.
> > > >
> > > > Without seeing all of your code, I can't tell you what you are doing
> > > > wrong, but the kernel should be giving you a huge hint here...
> > > >
> > > > Don't create duplicate names in the same subdirectory.
> > >
> > > I'm not doing that. One of my questions is if MKDEV(0, 0) is valid for
> > > create_device, which I inferred so from the documentation.
> >
> > Yes it is, but that's not the error given to you :)
> >
> > Many in-kernel users call device_create() with MKDEV(0, 0)
> >
> > > Here is the listing
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > It's not in any format to read, please never strip leading whitespace,
> > it hurts my brain...
> 
> (trying again)
> Also, this is in pastebin:  https://pastebin.com/8Ye9eUm5
> 
> #include <linux/kobject.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> 
> static ssize_t howareyou_show(struct class *class, struct class_attribute
> *attr,
>    char *buf)
> {
>         return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", "How are you?");
> }
> static CLASS_ATTR_RO(howareyou);

These are rare, as they are "global" for a class, are you sure you want
that?

> 
> static struct class my_class = {
>         .name =         "my-class",
>         .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
> };
> 
> struct device* child_device;
> 
> static int mypci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>       const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
>         int ret;
> 
>         ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
>         if (ret)
>                 return ret;
> 
>         ret = class_register(&my_class);
>         if (ret < 0)
>                 return ret;
> 
> 
>         pr_info("DFG: Recognized. DID: %lx\n", (unsigned long
> int)id->driver_data);
>         pr_info("DFG: device DID: %lx\n", (unsigned long int)pdev->device);
> 
>         ret = class_create_file(&my_class, &class_attr_howareyou);
>         if (ret != 0) {
>                pr_err("DFG class create file error: %d\n", ret);
>                class_unregister(&my_class);
>                return ret;
>        }
> 
>        child_device = device_create(&my_class, &pdev->dev, MKDEV(0, 0),
> NULL, "child");
>         if (child_device == NULL) {
>                pr_err("DFG error child device NULL");
>         }
> 
>         return ret;
> }
> 


Looks sane, what does your kernel log say when you load this?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ