linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] kernel/configs: don't include PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 04 Aug 2020 16:40:07 +0100
From:   Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        christoffer.dall@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH  v1 3/3] kernel/configs: don't include PCI_QUIRKS in KVM
 guest configs


Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> writes:

> On 2020-08-04 15:44, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> writes:
>> 
>>> On 2020-08-04 13:44, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>>> The VIRTIO_PCI support is an idealised PCI bus, we don't need a bunch
>>>> of bloat for real world hardware for a VirtIO guest.
>>> 
>>> Who says this guest will only have virtio devices?
>> 
>> This is true - although what is the point of kvm_guest.config? We
>> certainly turn on a whole bunch of virt optimised pathways with 
>> PARAVIRT
>> and HYPERVISOR_GUEST along with the rest of VirtIO.
>
> Most of which actually qualifies as bloat itself as far as KVM/arm64
> is concerned...

So here is the question - does the kernel care about having a blessed
config for a minimal viable guest? They are certainly used in the cloud
but I understand the kernel is trying to get away from having a zoo of
configs. What is the actual point of kvm_guest.config? Just an easy
enabling for developers?

>
>           M.


-- 
Alex Bennée