linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fixed misspelled word in comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <470c32c1a781f3973a87321abf03e2fcd2dfc1eb.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 04 Aug 2020 09:23:54 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Aditya Bansal <adbansal99@...il.com>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fixed misspelled word in comment

On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 16:07 +0530, Aditya Bansal wrote:
> Should I correct all the instances of the "careful" and submit the
> patch including both "carefull" and "function" word correct? or only
> for the "carefull"? I have already submitted one for the "funcion"
> word.

I suggest submitting a V2 patch with both fixes.

Generally it's better to submit all spelling fixes in a
single file at once, especially when multiple spelling
fixes are on the same line.

Also, it's generally better to submit separate patches
for individual files.