[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8643d122-c069-192e-8f3a-dc18f84eed9a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 10:37:47 +0800
From: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net
Cc: viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: CPPC: simply the code access 'highest_perf'
value in cppc_perf_caps struct
Hi everyone:
I want to know why my patch didn't merge into upstream ?
Thanks
在 2020/7/1 下午12:20, Xin Hao 写道:
> The 'caps' variable has been defined, so there is no need to get
> 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', you can use
> 'caps->highest_perf' instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> index 257d726a4456..051d0e56c67a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
> if (!max_khz)
> max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> mul = max_khz;
> - div = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> + div = caps->highest_perf;
> }
> return (u64)perf * mul / div;
> }
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
> } else {
> if (!max_khz)
> max_khz = cppc_get_dmi_max_khz();
> - mul = cpu->perf_caps.highest_perf;
> + mul = caps->highest_perf;
> div = max_khz;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists