[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200806094005.29296b53@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 09:40:05 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alastair D'Silva <alastair@...ilva.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the powerpc
tree
Hi all,
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 16:55:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the char-misc tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/misc/ocxl/config.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 3591538a31af ("ocxl: Address kernel doc errors & warnings")
>
> from the powerpc tree and commit:
>
> 28fc491e9be6 ("misc: ocxl: config: Provide correct formatting to function headers")
>
> from the char-misc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (as it was just differences in comments, I just arbitrarily
> chose the latter version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the powerpc tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists