linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the risc-v tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200805134138.1697bf4e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 5 Aug 2020 13:41:38 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, greentime.hu@...ive.com
Cc:     christian@...uner.io, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
        linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tklauser@...tanz.ch
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pidfd tree with the risc-v tree

Hi Palmer,

On Tue, 04 Aug 2020 18:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> >> diff --cc arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> index 76a0cfad3367,f6a3a2bea3d8..000000000000
> >> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> >> @@@ -57,9 -52,6 +57,8 @@@ config RISC
> >>   	select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
> >>   	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
> >>   	select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS
> >>  +	select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING
> >> - 	select HAVE_COPY_THREAD_TLS
> >>  +	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
> >>   	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU
> >>   	select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if MMU
> >>   	select HAVE_FUTEX_CMPXCHG if FUTEX  
> >
> > This is now a conflict between the risc-v tree and Linus' tree.  
> 
> Thanks.  I'd just pulled in some stuff and was intending on sending a PR to
> Linus tomorrow (we've got some autobuilders that run overnight that I like to
> give a crack at the actual commit before I send anything).  For this one I
> think the best bet is to just mention it to Linus as a conflict to be fixed --
> the only other thing I can think of would be to rebase my tree, which seems
> worse at this point.

Its pretty trivial, just mention it.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped